They focus on standards, improving themselves, and knowing the rules. Enneagram Type 1: Emphasizes being correct, organized, and sensible.“There are a number of hidden issues here: let me think about this.” They have little patience with rules or procedures. Relation to systems: Fives reject the system and want to work on their own, outside of it. Manages feelings by splitting off and abstracting feelings, they stay preoccupied and cerebral, as if their feelings were happening to someone else. They focus on the process, objective facts, and maintaining clarity and detachment. Enneagram Type 5: Emphasizes being the expert and having deep information.“There’s an efficient solution to this-we just need to get to work.” But they also like being outside of it-bending rules and finding shortcuts. Relation to systems: Threes want to work with the system. Manages feelings by repression and keeping attention on tasks, staying active.
Enneagram test type 3 how to#
They focus on goals, being pragmatic, and knowing how to present self. Enneagram Type 3: Emphasizes being efficient, capable, and outstanding.Main Themes of the Competency Group: Cut off feelings and solve problems logically This section of the summary will compare the three types in a variety of different ways. To show where I resonate the most with each type, I’ve highlighted some content in color. My three types are each in a different triad (Instinctive, Feeling, Thinking) and different Hornevian Groups (Assertives, Compliants, Withdrawns), but interestingly, they are all in the 1-3-5 harmonic pattern (the competency group).
Enneagram test type 3 free#
I don’t feel like I got much from this free test.Įnneagram Comparison for Types 3, 5, & 1 from The Wisdom of the Enneagram Book by Riso & Hudson.I took this test twice, and it typed me primarily as a Type 5.Overall, this free test seemed fairly accurate.It typed me as a 1w9 followed by a 5w6.This test confirmed my top three types, but it had them in a different order: Type 1, Type 5, and then Type 3.I haven’t taken this one yet.įree Online Tests: I’ve tried the following: It’s 144 paired statements and takes 45 minutes to complete (80% accuracy). If you want to go even further, you can take the paid Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicator (RHETI) at .Notice how close the scores are for Types 3 & 5. Type 1: 54-56 (most likely to misidentify as 5, 4, 6 - 3, 6, 7 are most likely to misidentify as 1).Type 5: 59-59 (most likely to misidentify as 4, 6, 1 - 9, 3, 1 are most likely to misidentify as 5).Type 3: 59-60 (most likely to misidentify as 5, 1, 8 - 8, 7, 9 are most likely to misidentify as 3).To show where I personally resonate the most with each type, I’ve also highlighted some content in color. I’ve added emphasis to some quotes throughout this post in bold. Quick Housekeeping: All quotes are from the authors unless otherwise stated. MBTI seems to stick to the psychological Enneagram combines the spiritual with the psychological which I find incredibly enlightening.Īll content in this post-except for a couple mentions of free online Enneagram tests-is from the book The Wisdom of the Enneagram: The Complete Guide to Psychological and Spiritual Growth for the Nine Personality Types (Amazon) by Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson.I’m still a novice when it comes to these type tools, so maybe this is an unfair initial impression. I feel like MBTI is more positive and focused on strengths Enneagram seems more focused on pitfalls and weaknesses.I’ve always received one clear answer for MBTI (my personality type is INTJ), but I have a mix of three types for Enneagram.In my opinion, there are a few noteworthy differences between MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) and Enneagram: Or, maybe I’m simply a conglomeration of all three Enneagram types. Why those three types out of the nine?īecause I feel like I’m stuck between all three of them. This post dives deeper into Enneagram types 3, 5, and 1.
Enneagram test type 3 full#
Looking for the full book summary? Personality meets Spirituality in “The Wisdom of the Enneagram” by Riso & Hudson (Book Summary)
0 kommentar(er)
